The case against Proportional Representation
Why Westminster-style democracy is superior to the Knesset circus
[A House of Commons’ debate. Does the UK's democratic system sacrifice democracy for stability? Image retrieved from Parliament.uk]
Introduction
A tale of two systems. The UK's Westminster versus the Israeli Knesset. A purist's First Past the Post (FPTP) dream versus a purist's Proportional Representation (PR) heaven. Single member constituencies where the candidate with the highest number of votes wins versus a distribution of seats exactly - or nearly exactly - equal to the percentage of votes cast for each political party. And despite there being a world lining up to disagree with me, I boldly declare that the Westminster approach is far superior and controversially, far more democratic.
Chapter 1: Blessed stability and imagined safe seats.
Chapter 2: Representing the major minorities.
Chapter 3: Minor minorities and voting for the national interest.
Chapter 4: The balance of power between the major minorities and the majority.
Chapter 5: “We have no democratic choice”: The falsehood thrown at First Past the Post.
Chapter 6: Coalition building: A question of timing.
Chapter 7: What is democracy?
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Guerre and Shalom to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.